Thursday, August 29, 2013

More of Akbar Allahabadi

Iniquitous! How can the preacher sacrifice the rhetoric, give up his nature,
Renounce religios qurrels and at risk, put his career
In his grief, Farhad when counselled restarint,
Asked,'' Tell me, what shall I do with the spade.

**************************************************
To the armies of the Sultan, Akbar never capitulated
But of the gibes of the wife dear, lay decimated.

**************************************************


Shall I divulge to you, what after death happened?
Friends dined and the Koran was canted.

****************************************************************



Saturday, May 11, 2013

Laila and Majnoon the legendry lovers put in modern perspective.
 by the poet Akbar Allahabadi
Whispered Mother of Laila to Majnoon
Son! If you pass the M.A., soon
Without more ado, I will marry Laila to you                                         
And be gracious mother in law, to you too
Sayeth Majnoon;  Pity old woman!  You do not differentiate
The baloney and the ambience passionate
Between the natural ardour of an admirer
And the tedious explanations of the lecturer
What has gone wrong with you! Thou lady old
A deer is not made to carry load
Indeed poor appreciation of my personality
Like Harchran Das, I cannot be
I come to sacrifice my heart, and my intent make plain
But refuse to let you con me or strain my brain
If this be the condition of engagement
With hope and regret, I tender, herewith, my resignation

Sunday, April 28, 2013

ये क्या हो रहा है, ये क्यों हो रहा है .
 
यह क्या माजरा है, यह कैसी सबा है.
निगाहों में उलझन, दिलों में धुआं है .
कुछ ऐसी भी मुश्किल नहीं दास्ताँ है.
कई अंजुमन हैं, कई रस्ते हैं .
न जाने ये क्यों, फिर, समा बदगुमां है.
ये किस मोढ़ पर आज, मेरा हिन्दोस्तां है.
यह क्या माजरा है, यह कैसी सबा है.
 
यह मोदी की हवा है, य राहुल की सदा है.
मन मोहन की दवा है, समझ में न आए ये क्या सिलसिला है.
ये सुषमा के नाले, लो अब तो जेटली भी खफ़ा है.
, लोगों का क्या हाल हम तुमको बताएं.
उसी उस ने लूटा, जिसको अवसर मिला.
जो कुछ भि है, हिन्दोस्तां बदगुमाँ है.
यह क्या माजरा है, यह कैसी सबा है.
 
यह स्कैम में हुकूमत य, फिर,हुकूमत में स्कैम है.
किस किस क नाम हम तुमको गिनाएं, न इससे कोई भी अछूता रहा है.
ये यू पी औ एम पी, बंगला भी ए पी भी.
ये सियासी दियारे, औ अफसर के दफ्टर भी.
चोरों कि बजती है सारे में तूती.
जो कुछ भी है, बस हिन्दोस्तां बदगुमाँ है.
यह क्या माजरा है, यह कैसी सबा है.
 
टी वी दिखए सियासी तमाशे,
स्टूडियो के माहिर इनक़लाबियों की जलवे.
रिटायर्ड अफसरों के जवांमार्दी के क़िस्से.
जजों की हिकायत, वकीलों की नसीहत.
इन तमाशों से सुधरी, वतन की न हालत.
इसी सब से शायद वतन बदगुमाँ है.
यह क्या माजरा है, यह कैसी सबा है.
 
चले पोछने सबके आंसू, भारत के रतन थे.
मिली राह में जब सुबह की किरण.
सुबह ने दिखाया धनो का द्वार.
रहबर बन गए रहज़न, बे-शुमार.
मुश्ल्किलें तो बहुत हैं, पै इरादे जवानां बुलंद.
यही है बस हिन्दोस्तान का मरम.
पै, अब तो मंज़र ये है, हिन्दोस्तां बदगुमाँ है.
यह क्या माजरा है, यह कैसी सबा है.
 
 

Tuesday, April 23, 2013

Vagary of an old and idle mind-2
A drop, in bosom of the river, I flow from birth to the end.
मैं क़तरा हूँ लेकिन बआगोशे दरिया अजल से अबद तक बहा जा रहा हूँ
If life moved in a salient then one would do well to be master of his trade and avoids the risk of being Jack of many trades and lose out on core competency. Therefore, should one concentrate on a good career and earn lots of money or should one also widen his horizons, acquire knowledge of topics other than one’s trade, have hobbies; interest himself in art and culture, stress good health and good relationships? Does life follow the pattern of modern day specialist, a heart specialist or a rocket scientist? Is it important for individual to bother himself with these questions or it is a charade because lives are unique and follow no patterns.
Can a life said to be well led if it is spent pursuing single course and one remains oblivious of other splendors and beauties surrounding life and living? Will contentment elude a person who is so focused? The point is what makes for completeness in life; all of a solitary feature or substantial aspects of man. If latter then in what proportions or the mathematics of proportions, here, is in fructuous. Would you agree, I do subscribe to the idea that one may, indeed legitimately conjure up a sense of achievement, yet the euphoria it will remain ephemeral. It would be like eating something you cherish but once you have chewed it and swallowed it, it is all over. The after taste does not linger for long. Even if it is so, so be it? Why deny one that sense of elation for the fear of its being is transitory? Further, question arises that if so, then why one must not strive for more achievements in his chosen field, a continuum of achievements to create reasonable degree of permanence through a series of transients rather than scare himself into dividing his energy in to several areas This issue does not appear important and the argument appears fallacious to me because the point is not to deny any thing to one self but to recognize that life itself is made up of various elements. Therefore, even single minded pursuit of an idea will need inputs from several other disciplines for neither the life nor the society in which sustains life, can continue upon fractions. The life appears to be focus of numerous the radiations.
 Thus, I deem it that sense of satisfaction will come by getting to lead a more rounded life where there is input from several welcome sources. In the Hindu thought, emphasis is laid on सन्तुलन, the nearest inadequate English expression, to my mind, would be balance. I think the word has stronger connotations of optimal amalgam rather that balancing the powers.  I accept that it is perfectly legitimate to seek more money so that efforts are not diluted and development is not stunted. However, when this desire for more riches becomes a craving and entirely over powering, it must disturb the सन्तुलन.
Another aspect is personal needs and relationships. Relationships need extra care because in pursuit of everyday activities and career one tends to take relationships for granted or just ignore relationships. If such a relationship even barely sustains then it is either efforts of the others or sheer providence. Whatever the reason, it shall hang by a thread and certainly not be a reason for sustained satisfaction of life well led. How does one nurture relationships? True it takes two to tango yet, to my mind, it can be achieved by not giving much or at least secondary importance to one self and giving more importance to others without professing covertly or overtly, ones exertion. Is there danger that the people tend to take you for granted? Well then perhaps one can practice it at least in closer circles and take the loss to sustain relationship. This effort will also mature one and prepare him to extend the idea to a larger group. Nurturing of relationship requires love and not treatise by Hersey and Blanchard. In this, there has to be a degree of surrender; not technical precision nor contractual exchange. One can practice it only when one enjoys doing so.
 It also implies an ability and desire to internalize everyday problems. ‘Kicking the dog’ syndrome will not serve the purpose. It will involve inculcating in oneself strength to look the issue in the eye and start to search for the solution without getting overwhelmed by the issue itself.